AI Integration in Health and Safety: Efficiency, Ethics, and Professional Oversight

The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) into professional settings has brought significant benefits, but it has also raised questions around ethics, transparency, and accountability. In health and safety, particularly within risk assessments, AI has the potential to improve efficiency, accuracy, and compliance. However, its use must be carefully managed, documented, and overseen by qualified professionals to avoid any perception of “cheating” or misuse.

AI is a tool—a powerful one—but its outputs are only as reliable as the human judgement that verifies and applies them. Let’s explore how AI can enhance health and safety risk assessments when combined with professional oversight.

---

Using AI in Health and Safety Risk Assessments

A Practical Scenario

Imagine a health and safety professional tasked with conducting risk assessments on a construction site. Traditionally, this process involves:

• Thorough site visits to identify hazards.
• Evaluating risks based on observations and experience.
• Developing control measures to mitigate those risks.

While effective, this approach is time-consuming and resource-intensive.

How AI Enhances the Process

By incorporating AI-powered tools, the professional can streamline their work:

• Data Analysis: AI analyses historical incident reports, real-time sensor data, and environmental factors (e.g., weather conditions).
• Preliminary Reporting: The AI generates a draft risk assessment, highlighting potential hazards and suggesting control measures based on data-driven patterns.

However, professional oversight remains essential. The health and safety professional must review, verify, and adapt AI-generated outputs to ensure they are context-specific, practical, and aligned with regulatory requirements.

---

Ethical and Regulatory Considerations

The integration of AI into risk assessments introduces several key considerations:

1. Transparency and Accountability

AI tools must never replace the human professional. While AI can generate insights, it is the expert’s role to:

• Review AI outputs for accuracy and relevance.
• Adapt recommendations based on site-specific conditions.
• Take Responsibility for the final risk assessment.

Presenting AI-generated reports as the sole product, without proper review, is both unethical and unsafe. AI can miss nuances that only human judgement can identify.

---

2. Compliance with Health and Safety Regulations

Health and safety legislation, such as the UK Management of Health and Safety at Work Regulations 1999, stipulates that risk assessments must be conducted by a “competent person”. AI is not a competent person—it is a tool.

• Professionals must retain final responsibility for assessments.
• AI can assist, but it cannot replace the experience, expertise, or accountability of qualified individuals.

---

3. Bias and Accuracy

AI systems rely on data—and data can be flawed. If the AI tool’s training data is incomplete or biased, the recommendations it generates may be unreliable.

• Regular validation of AI tools against current standards and practices is essential.
• Professionals must remain critical of AI outputs and ensure they are tested and refined over time.

---

4. Documenting AI Contributions

To maintain trust, transparency, and compliance, it is critical to clearly document how AI was used in the risk assessment process.

---

How to Document AI Contributions in Risk Assessments

1. Introduction or Methodology Section

Set the stage for transparency by explaining how AI was integrated into the process.

Example:
“This risk assessment was conducted with the assistance of an AI-powered tool, which analysed historical incident data, real-time sensor inputs, and environmental factors. The AI tool provided preliminary hazard identification and control measures, which were subsequently reviewed and verified by a qualified health and safety professional.”

---

2. Annotating AI-Generated Content

Clearly mark AI-generated sections within the report using footnotes, endnotes, or annotations.

Example:
“Hazard Identification (AI-Assisted): The AI tool identified the following hazards: ‘slippery surfaces during rain’ and ‘equipment overheating in direct sunlight.’ These findings were verified on-site by the health and safety professional to ensure accuracy and completeness.”

---

3. Including an AI Contribution Section

Create a distinct section to detail the AI’s role, its data sources, and its outputs.

Example:
AI Contribution to Risk Assessment
The AI tool analysed the following sources:

• Historical incident reports from similar sites.
• Weather data for the past decade.
• Real-time sensor data from the site.

The AI identified key risks, including:

• Increased likelihood of slips, trips, and falls during wet weather.
• Elevated risk of equipment malfunction under extreme heat.

Suggested control measures included:

• Installing non-slip mats during rainy conditions.
• Conducting equipment inspections during high temperatures.

“These AI-generated recommendations were reviewed, adapted, and approved by the health and safety team to ensure they aligned with site-specific conditions.”

---

4. Documenting the Review Process

Clearly explain the professional oversight process in a dedicated section.

Example:
Review and Validation
“All AI-generated outputs were subjected to a detailed review by the health and safety team. On-site inspections verified the presence of identified hazards, and control measures were adjusted as necessary to reflect the unique characteristics of the site. Final decisions were made by qualified professionals to ensure compliance with safety standards.”

---

5. Appendices or References

Provide details on AI data sources, algorithms, or tools used in the assessment process.

Example:
Appendix A: AI Data Sources

• Historical construction site incident reports (Source: [Name])
• Local weather data (Source: [Provider])
• Site-specific sensor inputs (Provider: [Name])

---

Conclusion: AI as a Partner, Not a Replacement

The integration of AI into health and safety risk assessments is not “cheating.” It is a tool—a means to enhance efficiency, accuracy, and insight. However, its use requires professional oversight to ensure outputs are reliable, context-specific, and aligned with regulatory standards.

By clearly documenting AI’s contributions, marking its role in the process, and detailing the professional review, businesses can:

• Maintain transparency and trust.
• Comply with legal and ethical requirements.
• Enhance safety without compromising integrity.

Ultimately, AI empowers health and safety professionals to focus on what they do best: applying their judgement, experience, and expertise to create safer workplaces. In this way, AI becomes not a shortcut, but a partner in progress—one that enhances, rather than diminishes, human capability.